3 Way Conferences divided by 5 = 0.6

Ah yes, this is my 7th year in a row having to do these Three Way Conferences. They rock, so far, but is harder than it looks. Report cards, PPP's, issues, ah, those were ARE the days. Okay, none of my marks were beginning to meet or not meeting (okay, perhaps one was, but that's a different story), but only time will tell if I have the highest mark in class, but there is a 50% chance I would. Maybe 25%, but I feel if you fool around, marks drop severely. If you focus on class, marks get higher and as well, you will not have homework, so here is an equation about them.

Subject matter + fooling around = low marks.

Respectively,

Subject matter - fooling around = high marks.

When you take away the fooling around, marks get higher but if you place it, marks get lower, which BEGS the question, why would anyone risk the carbs (losing marks).

Likewise,

Subject matter x Fooling Around = low marks
Subject matter / Fooling Around = high marks

So, when you think about it, higher marks are good, since if you divide fooling around from the subject matter, it is like subtraction, higher marks but if you multiply and/or add them, low marks happen, and to conclude this message, which seems better to you, students? Low marks and fooling around, so you would work at a McJob? Or high marks and a great education for a highly structured job. Please, no offense everyone, it is just that education is so important, because without it, you would be at a McJob, or even worse, poverty. And the same question of low marks or higher marks does apply in this following form.

Oxford? Or some diploma mill.

Until then, have a nice day.